Porcupyn's Blog

September 11, 2007

Federerated Republic of Roger

Filed under: Tennis — Porcupyn @ 1:01 am

Got a comment from a friend that Federer did not play well at all in winning the U.S.Open this time around, and he got the feeling that Djokovic was gonna get him. After I throw up a proverb or two at him (there’s many a slip … for one), I gotta say this that I recently read somewhere – The mark of a champion is not in winning when playing well, it is in winning on an off day.

That said, I still beg to differ. Federer was not playing well, maybe, but only by his lofty standards. How can anyone say that he was attacking less than Djokovic? I don’t have the match taped, but I am pretty sure that Federer painted enough sidelines during the match and – for sure – nailed the corner once (I still remember that replay showing the ball right inside the corner). You don’t attempt passing shots on both flanks, attack the net, nail booming first serves when down 0-40, if you are not agressive. Djokovic did not lose his service games entirely due to his fault – yes, there were some crucial double faults, but do you know what causes double faults? Pressure, for one; pressure, which is felt only when you know that if you throw in an ordinary serve, it will be returned extraordinarily!

Watching Federer – and believe me, this is the first time I have watched him play four matches in one single tournament – one gets the feeling that he is still not trying at his highest level (there was a Czech who used to play like that – Mecir). All those four matches (Isner onwards), I thought he was toying with his opponents.

Ever had this nightmare of being late for a train; you run onto the platform trying to grab the door of the last compartment; you are almost there when, with a sudden burst of acceleration, the train pulls out, and you have fallen flat on your face trying to clutch that handle which was there a split second ago.

Now ask Isner, Roddick, Davydenko, and Djokovic, and see whether they agree or not! To give the opponent that hope that he has the match in his grasp, only to prise it from his tightly clenched fist, that’s what Federer did in those four consecutive matches. Poor Davydenko – he didn’t lose a set before the semis, but didn’t win one during.

And to all those who still would argue that Federer was not attacking enough, I give you the last point of either the first set or the second set (I forget which) – on a decent approach shot, Djokovic approached the net. It was not a tentative approach by any means, and the ball was on Federer’s backhand corner. Before he hit the shot, I knew Federer was gonna nail Djokovic on that one. As a lunging Djokovic found his racket short of the sideline by a foot or two (could not have been more), Federer’s down the line backhand passing shot curled right around Djokovic’s racket and fell well inside the baseline/sideline corner. Djokovic could only stare!

Tennis at the top level, I think, is 50% mental, 50% skill, 25% pluck (some people don’t pronounce the p), and the rest is perspiration. If this does not add up to 100%, well, you’ve got it. You need more than 100% to get into 10 Grand Slam Finals in a row!



  1. Certainly a good quote there. I won’t argue on Federer’s skills and abilities. That would be quite foolish, to say the least.

    When I said that he disappointed me, I meant strictly in terms of watching good tennis. He was just not playing good tennis. He was certainly better than his opponents, no doubt about it.

    My point is that if he plays this kind of tennis, then there will be a person who can beat him sooner than I thought. My take is that he will rule for at least another 5 years (for the most part!).

    But, he cannot afford to play the kind of tennis he did in US open. Fine, Roddick may have played to the best of his abilities (I really felt bad for him, actually), but not the other junior players. they are all up and coming and I bet they will start working on their games.

    Someone like Safin ‘would’ have been a player to watch out for. But well, I guess federer is way too good and the opponents are way too weak, that is certainly the reality.

    And trust me, I do like Federer to rule for 5 more eyars, but I just pray to God that the opponents play much stronger tennis, so that we can watch better games. (Yes Venus vs Jankovic and Federer vs Roddick were good games!).

    Comment by December Stud — September 12, 2007 @ 7:14 pm | Reply

  2. You’re tagged

    Let the World know you exist 😉

    Comment by December Stud — September 14, 2007 @ 6:36 pm | Reply

  3. Very well analyzed.
    “The mark of a champion is not in winning when playing well, it is in winning on an off day.” Lovely quote and very true.
    Competitive Sports at any level does involve mind games.
    Sports throws up heroes who look like immortals.Each uncomparable with the others .Each looks invincible and eternal as long as she/he is playing.
    Magical moments.Poetic moments.

    Comment by neel3 — September 17, 2007 @ 2:21 am | Reply

  4. Neela:

    Thank you for your appreciative words. 🙂


    I put up all this stuff about Federer but really, I am not as big a fan of his as I was of Steffi for more than a decade! 🙂 Which is why I really mean it (totally objectively) when I say that he has all the shots and plays them better than Steffi did (re: my criticism of her lacking the topspin backhand), each compared to their peers of course.

    “My point is that if he plays this kind of tennis, then there will be a person who can beat him sooner than I thought.”

    I agree with that, for sure.

    BTW, check out this quote of Federer’s on TennisPlanet –> “If Safin or Roddick and all these other guys would’ve gotten more [Slams], people would think there is much more depth now. But they didn’t. Because I’ve taken them all.” As a devil’s advocate, I now need to provide balance too!

    Comment by porcupyn — September 20, 2007 @ 1:04 am | Reply

  5. D.S.:

    I post. Obviously I exist. But I take the fifth on the tag thing

    Well, except for the song issue – there’s several pages of song links here; any one of them would be OK for me. 🙂

    Comment by porcupyn — September 20, 2007 @ 1:11 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: